Kristine Barnett, EdD
Vice Provost for Academic Affairs and Dean, Liberal Studies and Title IX Coordinator
A sampling of policies is included below for quick access. Complete academic
A student who wishes to challenge a final course grade must submit an email request to the faculty member, the Department Chair and the Dean of the applicable school/division within 14 days of the issue of the final grade report. Petitions submitted beyond the two-week period may be accepted at the discretion of the faculty member who issued the final grade. The faculty member should respond by e-mail reply to the student within three weeks with copies to the Department Chair, the University Registrar, and the Dean of the applicable school/division. The student or the faculty member may refer the matter to the Department Chair, or the Dean of the applicable school/division if the Department Chair is the faculty member who issued the grade. The Dean is the final appeal. Conferral of a degree closes all challenges. In matters of academic integrity, grade challenges may be referred to the Academic Integrity Committee.
Undergraduate and graduate students are subject to requirements based on a particular catalog, referred to as the student’s “catalog year.” The catalog year is determined for new students as the catalog in effect at the time of their initial enrollment in courses at Bay Path, provided there is no break of more than 12 months in enrollment. The student’s catalog year determines both the major and general education requirements for degree completion; therefore, students who are reinstated to Bay Path after leaving in poor standing will be placed on the catalog in effect when they return.
Except as provided in 34 CFR 668.8(k) and (l), a credit hour is an amount of work represented in intended learning outcomes and verified by evidence of student achievement that is an institutionally established equivalency that reasonably approximates not less than –
This policy and process
The student first should discuss the complaint directly with the faculty member and try to resolve it at that level. A student who attempts to begin the process at a higher administrative level will be directed to address the issue with the faculty member first.
If the student refuses to confer with the faculty member or the faculty member refuses to confer with the student, the student may confer with the department chair/program director or with a faculty advisor. If such a meeting occurs prior to the student meeting with the faculty member, the department chair will inform the faculty member of the student’s request to meet and, if known, the nature of the issue, prior to the meeting. The department chair/program director will not engage in substantive discussion with the student (i.e., inquire into the exact details or circumstances surrounding the complaint) but will listen to the student’s concerns, inform the student that the concerns will be communicated to the faculty member, recommend that the student
If an acceptable solution is not reached at this stage of the process (as stated above), the student must then document his or her complaint in writing and deliver a copy to the faculty member and the department chair/program director, respectively. In these
If the resolution is unacceptable to the student, the student may appeal to the Dean. The decision of the Dean is final and may not be appealed further.
If the resolution is unacceptable to the student, the student may appeal to the University Provost. The decision of the University Provost is final and may not be appealed further.
This policy applies to all credit-bearing online courses or programs offered by the Bay Path University, beginning with the application for admission and continuing through to a student’s graduation, transfer or withdrawal from the University. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that Bay Path University operates in compliance with the provisions of the United States Federal Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) concerning the verification of student identity in distance education and the expectation of the New England Commissions of Higher Education (NECHE).
The HEOA requires that institutions offering distance education or correspondence courses or programs have processes in place to ensure that the student registering for a course is the same student who participates in the course or receives course credit. The HEOA requires that institutions use one of the following three methods:
Bay Path University employs a secure login and
Students use their unique credentials, including their Bay Path email address and a password, to access the My Bay Path portal, which is the gateway to a number of information systems and resources including Canvas, the University’s learning management system. Canvas integrates with University authentication services to ensure appropriate and secure student access to course materials. All users of the University’s learning management system are responsible for maintaining the security of login information and passwords and any other access credentials as required. Attempting to discover another user's password or attempts to gain unauthorized access to another person's files or email is prohibited.
In the event that an exam for a distance course must be proctored, the instructor is required to make arrangements in advance with students. These arrangements must include advance notification of any fees associated with proctoring.
Bay Path University complies fully with the provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232g, which protects the privacy of student information in distance education by requiring, with certain limited exceptions, that the student's consent must be obtained before disclosing any personally identifiable information in the student's education records.